MPs anger at Incinerator decision


MPs Robbie Moore and Philip Davies

Keighley and Ilkley MP Robbie Moore and Shipley MP Philip Davies have this week learnt that the Environment Agency will grant a permit to Endless Energy to operate the controversial proposed incinerator at Marley on the outskirts of Keighley.


The incinerator has been in the pipeline for many years after Bradford Council granted planning permission for the incinerator back in 2016. The Environment Agency has now run two consultations on their decision to award an environmental permit for the site – with their last consultation running during the first national lockdown.


The decision has now been made to grant an environmental permit for the site with work expected to start imminently. Robbie and Philip have been working with the Aire Valley Against Incineration campaign group who have been championing residents’ views on the incinerator – and making the case for the proposed development not to go ahead.


Commenting Robbie said: “This is a sad day for Keighley and the wider area. I am incredibly disappointed and angry at the decision as I feel that the case for approval does not stack up. I still do have severe concerns regarding its development and the impact on air quality, especially with the site being situated within a valley, within close proximity to playing fields, schools and homes. There has been strong local opposition to this development, and I know just how hard the Aire Valley Against Incineration campaign group have worked to ensure this development doesn’t go ahead. I have seen many of the submissions made throughout the consultation in which many local residents submitted genuine concerns linked to the detrimental impact this will have on air quality, not only linked to the incinerator itself but also increased traffic levels bringing waste to the site.”


“I raised many similar objections in my response to the consultation – which I wrote jointly with my neighbouring MP Philip Davies – focusing on the inadequate and unfair consultation process, topography and temperature Inversions, negative impact on air quality and pollution as well as concerns about the impact on health. It is extremely disappointing therefore that these concerns have been dismissed. On the topic of Air Quality, I have been told by the Environment Agency that they could only take into account proposed emissions from the incinerator, and they have deemed this will be satisfactory. In regard to increased traffic emissions, the En